China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

China VS USA and Taiwan conflict
China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

Introduction of China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

Since the end of the Cold War, political, business, and opinion rulers in modern industrialized democracies have widely understood as a fundamental truth that expanding global movements of goods, wealth, knowledge, thoughts, and individuals are unavoidable, irrecoverable, and, broadly speaking, encouraging signs. It was formerly thought that as the world’s economies and societies became more intertwined. And efficiency would increase, wealth and prosperity would rise for all countries. And the gap between rich and poor would lessen.  China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

These trends would foster mutual appreciation across cultures, promote the diffusion of liberal democratic values and institutions, and improve the likelihood of global harmony and cooperation. Some developments over the past few years, however, have cast suspicion on these long-held convictions. Increased abrasion between the United States and China over commerce, investments, and innovation, as well as their growing military, diplomatic, and philosophical disagreements, has highlighted the possibility of “decoupling” between the world’s two biggest economies. (Friedberg)

The Taiwan problem and the South China Sea dispute have become flashpoints in the ongoing tug of war between China and the United States. As part of its “One China Policy,” China intends to incorporate Taiwan into its territory, but the United States—greatest China’s enemy—is demanding this move. Beijing’s aggressive measures, like as flying fighter planes near the island, have only become worse. Analysts have raised fears that a Chinese attack on Taiwan may spark a confrontation between China and the United States.

Describing ‘One China Policy’

In 1949, when the Chinese civil war finally came to a conclusion, the strategy was first implemented. As the Communists created the PRC and got hold of the country, the beaten Patriots, also known as the Kuomintang, fled to Taiwan and established a new government there. The two groups each claimed to speak for all of China. Since then, the Communist Party in power in China has warned of military action in the event that Taiwan officially declares autonomous status. But it has also taken a more conciliatory official tack toward the island in recent years.

As a precaution against Communist China, several states, including the United States, first recognized Taiwan. From the 1970s onward, however, diplomatic tides altered as China and the United States perceived a mutual need to deepen connections. The United States and other nations severed relations with Taipei on the side of  Beijing.

However, several continue keep open commercial offices or cultural institutions with Taiwan. And the United States is still Taiwan’s most vital security partner. The approach, which has effectively isolated Taiwan diplomatically, has been most beneficial to Beijing. Most of the world, including the UN, does not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign nation. It goes through enormous revamping efforts to fit in with international organizations like the Olympics and the World Trade Organization.

Taiwan Response:

However, Taiwan has not lost everything due to its isolation. It keeps strong relationships with its neighbours in the areas of economy and culture. And uses its longstanding emotional connection to the United States to gain power. It uses a small but potent cadre of lobbyists in Washington, DC, including former senator Bob Dole. Who according to media outlets in the United States, played a role in setting up the contentious phone call between President Trump and Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen. As China is the United States’ biggest foreign borrower and a major business associate. Therefore, the United States could benefit from public interactions with China while secretly keeping strong links with Island. The United States’ One China policy is a finely-tuned balancing act. Uncertainty surrounds Washington’s ability to carry on as usual.

United States of America’s policy towards China’s ‘One China Policy’

It’s diplomatic recognition of China’s insistence that its stance on their being only one Chinese government is correct. It proclaims that the United States will acknowledge the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as China’s legal government and terminate all formal links with Taiwan, which the PRC views as a dissident province that should be reunited with the mainland.

Washington keeps up a “strong unofficial” connection with Taiwan as part of this strategy, and this includes continuing weaponry deliveries to the island so that it can protect itself, which is not an approval of Beijing’s position. Taiwan’s administration asserts independence under the name “Republic of China,” but any nation desiring diplomatic relationships with mainland China must stop dealing with Taipei. As a result, Taiwan’s diplomatic ties with the rest of the world have cooled. After years of thawing relations, President Jimmy Carter officially formed diplomatic connections with Beijing in 1979. The United States severed connection with Taiwan and shuttered its embassy in Taipei as a response.

Yet in the same year, it approved the Taiwan Relations Act, which ensures full commitment for Taiwan. The United States still provides armaments to Taiwan in order to aid in its defense. The United States has also indicated it supports “productive conversation” between the two parties and calls for a negotiated settlement of their issues. It has a low-key footprint in Taipei through the American Institute in Taiwan, a private business that engages in official initiatives on its behalf. The United States maintains its “one China policy,” which maintains that both parties of the Taiwan Strait should engage amicably on a settlement to the sovereignty dispute. The United States does not recognize the Republic of China (ROC) as a sovereign nation and does not recognize Taiwan as part of China.

 Taiwan Relations Act China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

Congress enacted the Taiwan Relations Act in 1979 after Carter acknowledged the PRC to defend U.S. security and commercial interests in Taiwan. TRA allowed continuous interactions without bilateral agreements. It specified U.S. security guarantees and allowed Congress to monitor Taiwan affairs. The bill obliged the president to notify Congress of any threat to Taiwan and confer with lawmakers on a reaction. The TRA allowed economic, artistic, and other exchanges between the US and Taiwan. Each consecutive Congress has reiterated the TRA to guarantee that the exclusion of diplomatic links does not harm the US-Taiwan relationship.

The TRA establishes the American Institute in Taiwan as the corporate entity interacting with U.S. relations with the island; explicitly says that the U.S. option to develop official relations with the PRC depends on the assumption that Taiwan’s destiny will be considered by nonviolent methods; deems any attempt to figure out Taiwan’s destiny by other than nonviolent methods, including boycotts or blockades, a threat to the peace and security of the United States.

TRA underscores that preserving and enhancing Taiwanese human rights are U.S. goals. The TRA allows the US to maintain commercial, cultural, and military links with Taiwan. A non-governmental organization contracted by the State Department (AIT) and TECRO manage Taiwan-U.S. relations. These two local groups handle unofficial U.S.-Taiwan ties, although neither is an embassy.

Taiwan China rift- A Historical Overview 

Taiwan is a territory divided from China by the Taiwan Strait. It’s been autonomous from mainland China, the PRC, since 1949. The PRC considers Taiwan as a breakaway province and promises to “unite” it. Taiwan’s legitimately elected authorities disagree on the island’s identity and ties with the mainland.  Cross-strait hostilities have risen since Tsai Ing-2016 wen’s victory. Tsai has turned down a cross-strait formula proposed by Ma Ying-jeou. Beijing says there’s “one China” and Taiwan is portion of it. It regards the Peoples Republic of China as China’s only legal government and desires Taiwan’s “integration” with the mainland.

Beijing maintains that the 1992 Accord, signed by CCP and KMT leaders, constrains Taiwan. The two parties disagree on the substance of this so-called accord, which never addressed Taiwan’s legal position. For the PRC, the 1992 Accord states that “the two parties of the strait pertain to one China and would pursue national reunion.” For the KMT, “one China, diverse definitions” signifies the ROC. China, Mongolia, Taiwan, Tibet, and the South China Sea are all recognized under Taiwan’s KMT-drafted constitution. KMT denies Taiwan’s autonomy and wants tighter relations with Beijing. KMT officials have explored changing the party’s stance on the 1992 Accord after successive electoral setbacks.

DPP, the KMT’s main opponent, has never embraced the 1992 Accord. President Tsai, DPP leader, refuses to recognize the agreement. She has instead sought a Beijing-friendly version.

In her 2016 inauguration statement, Tsai declared she was “elected president based on the Constitution of the Republic of China,” a one-China constitution, and she would “protect the Republic of China’s integrity and borders.” Tsai also gave assent to “handle cross-strait activities in line with the Republic of China Constitution, the Act Governing Relations Between [the] Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, and other applicable legislation.” Beijing rebuffed this and cut relations with Taiwan.

Xi repeated China’s lengthy plan for Taiwan: “one nation, two administrations.” This is the identical strategy used for Hong Kong, which was given political and economic independence. Taiwanese dislike this structure. Tsai and even the KMT have denounced the “one nation, two systems” paradigm.

Current Tensions between Taiwan and China and its Repercussions

Ties involving Taiwan and China have worsened since Pelosi’s trip, which Beijing called “very hazardous.” Three of China’s six risk areas intersect Taiwan’s territorial seas. Taiwan believes the measure breached its integrity and equated to an embargo. China resumed large-scale military exercises surrounding Taiwan on August 8. China and Taiwan’s hostilities were rising. In 2021, China sent fighter planes into Taiwan’s Air Defense Zone, a self-declared territory where foreign airplanes are recognized, tracked, and managed for homeland safety.

October 2021, 56 airplane intrusions were recorded in an one day, and Taiwan’s defense minister said ties were the worst in 40 years. In 2020, Taiwan released aviation assault statistics. In May, President Biden warned China that the U.S. would defend Taiwan militarily if invaded. “That’s the pledge we made,” Biden stated of protecting Taiwan. Before the World Trade Center attack and its repercussions, the only likely area for two significant nuclear powers to clash was the Taiwan Strait. The validity of China’s communist leadership depends on preventing Taiwan’s independence. Chinese officials fear that if they permit Taiwan become autonomous and don’t react, they’ll be ousted by nationalists. They may be prepared to participate in “self-defeating armed excursions” to avert this, even if they know they will fail. China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

As missile shooting freezes over the Taiwan Strait, a new trade danger emerges. Persistent Chinese combat operations surrounding Taiwan could hinder ships on a key economic corridor. Beijing expanded its military exercises from Sunday to Wednesday. And state media stated that crossing the strait’s median line would become “routine.” China launched a new white paper on “union” with Taiwan on Wednesday, alerting “Taiwanese independence forces” and detailing the US’s role in countering China’s attempts.

Andy Mok, a senior research researcher at the state-backed Center for China and Globalization, told Al Jazeera that the “Taiwan problem” is in progress. We don’t understand the training exercises’ duration or scope.

A few think the blockage has begun. Upsurge threatens global trade. The NYT Dealbook editorial said “a Beijing aggression would have profound economic effects.” Similar to the Covid-19 epidemic and Ukraine-Russia war, escalating animosity between China and Taiwan might send global financial markets into a downturn. Taiwan’s exports of sophisticated semiconductors totaled $118 billion last year, according to government figures. Deng sought to reduce Taiwan’s 40% exports to China.

China’s exercises, spurred by Nancy Pelosi’s travel to the island last week. Show Beijing can impede international trade flows if it chooses. Half of the world’s carrier ships and 90% of its biggest boats by tonnage have sailed through the Strait this year, facilitating trade between East Asia and worldwide markets. Transportation statistics indicate boats continued usual strait routes this week. If China’s combat operations become a constant threat, the sector may need emergency measures. Several operators will stop calling Taiwan, while others will do so less often.

Sand stated that if the Taiwan Strait lost its free passage, all routes would be stretched. And travel durations would increase, and it would take longer for goods to reach consumers. Before a ‘new normal’ for regional trade channels is formed, shipping prices will be most impacted. Deborah Elms, executive director of the Singapore-based Asian Trade Centre, said creating maritime channels takes time and effort. Elms told Al Jazeera that transformation is harder in tough economic times. Corporations are looking for clarification on the extent, scope, and length of what’s ahead. (Gibson)

Blockade intervention  China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

Blockades that prevent trade might prompt global action. Elbridge Colby, a former high-ranking US defense official, told Al Jazeera that if China imposed a complete or partial embargo, the US should join with like-minded nations to provide Taiwan with crucial supplies. This would require defying China’s embargo. Colby warned against “symbolic action” that might cause unrest. “Talk gently and carry a large rod, not flutter our feathers,” he remarked. V.Group, the world’s largest freight company, asked NATO to guide trade boats into the Black Sea in April, claiming safety hazards from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

Analysts say shipping companies are wary of such restrictions unless as a last option since they avoid risky places like contested areas. “If the US navy puts up a channel in Taiwan Strait, a few will utilise it, but others would stay away,” said Sand. China’s economy depends on Strait commerce. Lloyd’s List warns China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO), the biggest business ship in China and the fourth-largest in the world, of self-inflicted destruction. Shanghai, Shenzhen, Ningbo, and Guangzhou are among the world’s five biggest harbors.

“China will move cautiously, and I don’t foresee the scenario to deteriorate,” Sand added. However, hostilities will rise.

Although disrupting international commerce would cost China, several experts highlight Beijing’s growing emphasis on political over economic interests. Adhering to a harsh “zero COVID” plan attempts to close down vast areas of the country. “The Chinese leadership under Xi Jinping has displayed a readiness to forgo short or medium-term economic benefits for political goals,” said Mok. “Forcible reunion doesn’t mean an amphibious assault.” First, I expect an air and maritime embargo of Taiwan. Mok said he didn’t anticipate Beijing to openly declare an embargo since doing so would offer the US a better basis to interfere, which would hurt China.

“China’s ‘grey-zone activities’ fit with this,” he added, alluding to acts that establish territorial rights without endangering war. Elms noted that Asian governments don’t always favor economic interests. “Governments can bear big economic penalties if they’re passionate,” she remarked, (Gibson). The Taiwan Strait is the world’s most deadly hotspot because a battle here would include numerous countries. The US won’t sit still. Taiwan Strait is a vital marine connector for Japan and other nearby countries. The channel can’t close. Several nations will intervene.

Matter of violation of International Law of the Seabed

China conducted “multi-service coordinated military readiness inspections” near Taiwan as the U.S. and Taiwan increased commercial relations in early June. After a leading Chinese General sparred with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore, China’s Foreign Ministry proclaimed on June 13 that the Taiwan Strait is not international waters, but “China’s internal waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, and exclusive economic zone in that sequence.”” The U.S. State Department replied by sending an anti-submarine airplane across the Strait to make its argument.

China deployed 29 fighter planes into Taiwan’s ADIZ on June 22. Taiwan Strait is global. China’s claims can undermine international trade, transportation, and the rule of law. China has a 12-nautical-mile maritime boundary off its shores under UNCLOS, to which it is a signatory. China doesn’t recognize Taiwan a sovereign state, hence it asserts 12 nautical miles off Taiwan’s shore as its maritime borders. Despite Taiwan’s standing as a nation, the Taiwan Strait comprises global seas and airways. Within this area of international waters and airways, all governments and ships possess transit and airspace liberties and all authorized marine and air usage. (Goldenziel)

Taiwan stated Tuesday that China’s declaration of authority over the Taiwan Strait is erroneous. And that only a nation’s 12-nautical-mile territorial waters are autonomous. Taiwan’s MOFA spokesperson, Joanne Ou, accused Beijing of manipulating international law by rejecting Taipei’s authority assertion over the Taiwan Strait and lowering the strait to its own EEZ, Focus Taiwan reported. Taiwan would engage with like-minded nations to strengthen harmony and security in the Indo-Pacific region, she added. She said Taiwan Strait is international water, with exception of territorial seas. “Our administration has always supported overseas boats’ legal Taiwan Strait activity.

According to Focus Taiwan,

Ou’s words are a reply to her Chinese counterpart, Wang Wenbin, who claimed on Monday that the waterway was subject to China’s maritime borders and EEZ under UNCLOS and local law. Wang refuted US arguments that the passage should be considered as international waters and stated Beijing owns the Taiwan Strait. China has sovereignty over the Taiwan Strait and respects other nations’ coastal boundaries. China VS USA and Taiwan conflict

“UNCLOS has no “international waters.” By saying the Taiwan Strait is global seas, certain nations undermine China’s autonomy and safety “”Wang’’. UNCLOS allows nations to declare 12 nautical miles (22 km) from the shore as their maritime borders. They can also declare waters up to 200 nautical miles from the shore as an EEZ, where they have sovereign rights over the water column, sea bottom, and commodities, but other nations can ship through or fly over. UNCLOS does not describe international waters, although it does classify the High seas as waters beyond the territorial sea or regions beyond EEZs. The Taiwan Strait is fewer than 200 nautical miles wide, resulting in conflicting EEZ assertions by Taiwan and China.

ASEAN and conflict of Taiwan Strait

The U.S., Japan, Australia, and G7 nations’ criticism of Beijing’s violent response to Pelosi’s visit, together with appeals for all parties to exercise caution from South Korea and the EU, might inspire ASEAN members to forge stronger relations with Taiwan. This might happen via stronger collaboration with Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, the government’s centerpiece foreign policy effort, or the purchasing of additional Taiwanese items to fill the vacuum caused by China’s import restriction in reaction to Pelosi’s tour.

For this situation to occur, ASEAN would require great resolve and a long-term view. ASEAN didn’t specify Taiwan, China, or the U.S. in its latest cross-Strait declaration. Rather than supporting or criticizing the groups, ASEAN raised reservations “with international and regional fluctuation,” called for “optimum limitation,”. And illustrated its eagerness “to perform a productive role in promoting serene conversation among all stakeholders, including via ASEAN-led processes.”

As China’s persuasion has been speeding up, as seen during the Taiwan conflict, Chinese leaders could install huge activities in the disputed waters to display Beijing’s unfaltering might and earn political support. This choice endangers the ASEAN plaintiff states – Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines – and broadens the authority imbalance between China and these small nations. ASEAN members exposed to Beijing’s might and with coastal conflicts should benefit from Taiwan. With the shifting balance among Beijing, Taipei, and Washington, China might use its anti-access zone restriction policy to prevent foreign backing for smaller and weaker governments.

Persistent polarization between Taiwan and China might lead Southeast Asian politicians to isolate themselves from Taiwan to prevent Chinese economic reprisal. An increase of Sino-Taiwan relations poses a difficult scenario for ASEAN members, who may choose to stand with China. The more precarious the relation between China and Taiwan, the less likely Southeast Asian nations will be to back the island democracy.

Given ASEAN’s ambition to enhance its importance while maintaining its impartiality in the midst of major power contest, there appears to be no better method for overcoming these examinations than by bolstering its intrinsic unification, concentrating on post-pandemic economic growth. And boosting unity among ASEAN economies to alleviate obstacles, and broadening and widening ASEAN’s connections with burgeoning crucial foreign stakeholders like the U.S., Japan, and China. ASEAN’s 55th birthday brings opportunity and difficulties.


Without a question, Taiwan is a prospective hotspot. An intriguing aspect of the modern world is that every significant threat to security and stability that has the capacity to explode on a massive level can be traced back to Asia. Nothing of interest exists in Europe. Imagining a situation where Europe would be the catalyst for a worldwide war suddenly is impossible. It is possible to picture three in Asia. On the Korean peninsula, tents may still be seen standing. Clearly, the nuclear hostility between India and Pakistan and the deteriorating relations across the Taiwan Strait could lead to another global conflict.

The United States lacks a defined and forceful position in an armed conflict. Making the Taiwan Strait issue all the more difficult to resolve. From the standpoint of a defense strategist or military strategist, the most surprising thing is that if you look across the world… You see a significant U.S. role in attempting to heal divides and promote peace, virtually everywhere. In the beginning, we just abdicated our diplomatic responsibilities in the Taiwan Strait. But it’s also a spot where the United States may suddenly insert its military into the fray. China VS USA and Taiwan conflict